Every covered manufacturer has to publish test results. What nobody tells you is how differently they’ve chosen to do it — and which ones make you buy the product before you can look.
I opened every one of these. They’re sorted by the only question that matters when you’re standing in an aisle: can you see a result without already owning the product?
Check before you buy
No package needed
Open tables or product-name search. You can look these up from the aisle, or from your couch before you order.
Same platform as Target’s. Search by product name, results in ppb.
Published, but stale or awkward
Check the date
Real numbers exist, but they’re images, PDFs or posts that don’t clearly track the product you’re holding. Look at the date before you take reassurance from them.
Screenshots covering 2024–2025, with nothing newer posted.
You need the package in your hand
Buy first, learn after
These require a lot code, batch number or UPC off the physical product — so you can’t compare before buying. This is the exact practice California’s Attorney General flagged in March 2026.
Two honest caveats. First, a tier here reflects how easy the results are to reach — not how clean they are. A brand can publish beautifully and still have a high result, or gate everything and be perfectly fine. Don’t read the green tier as a shopping list. Second, this is a snapshot: pages get rebuilt and files go stale. If you find one of these broken, tell me and I’ll fix it.
Brands not listed either had no page I could confirm, or aren’t covered by the law. Infant formula — including Bobbie — is excluded from AB 899 entirely. For a wider list, the nonprofit Unleaded Kids maintains one, and Consumer Reports rates 39 brands on accessibility.